Changes

All the prevailing, well-accepted theories of the origin of the Moon from the 1970's were completely disproven by the lunar landings and studies of the lunar rocks afterwards.  The material, to the surprise of scientists, lacked iron that permeates the Earth's crust.

All the prevailing, well-accepted theories of the origin of the Moon were completely disproven by the lunar landings and studies of the lunar rocks afterwards.  The material, to the surprise of scientists, lacked iron that permeates the Earth's crust.

Specifically, each of these prevailing scientific theories were disproven by the lunar landings:<ref name="PSI">Planetary Science Institute: [http://www.psi.edu/projects/moon/moon.html The Origin of the Moon]</ref>

Specifically, each of these prevailing scientific theories were disproven by the lunar landings:<ref name="PSI">Planetary Science Institute: [http://www.psi.edu/projects/moon/moon.html The Origin of the Moon]</ref>

== Giant-Impact Model ==

== Giant-Impact Model ==

For ten years after the lunar landings, scientists lacked any accepted theory about the Moon's origin.  In 1984, an international meeting was convened in Kona, Hawaii, for the purpose of agreeing on a new theory for the origin of the Moon.<ref>''Id.''</ref>  The attendees at the meeting agreed upon the following "giant-impact model," which was first proposed in 1975 but which had not yet been generally accepted.<ref>''Id.''</ref>

For ten years after the lunar landings, non-creationist scientists lacked any accepted theory about the Moon's origin.  In 1984, an international meeting was convened in Kona, Hawaii, for the purpose of agreeing on a new theory for the origin of the Moon.<ref>''Id.''</ref>  The attendees at the meeting agreed upon the following "giant-impact model," which was first proposed in 1975 but which had not yet been generally accepted.<ref>''Id.''</ref>

This theory proposes an impact with a large planetesimal (asteroid-like body) released a great quantity of debris into orbit, a portion of which collected under the influence of gravity. There is no direct evidence for this theory.  It is supported by scientists, however, because only it might explain the following:

This theory proposes an impact with a large planetesimal (asteroid-like body) released a great quantity of debris into orbit, a portion of which collected under the influence of gravity. There is no direct evidence for this theory.  It is supported by non-creationist scientists, however, because only it might explain the following:

**The lack of iron, provided the impact of the planetesimal happened relatively late in the earth's formation and after the Earth's iron had sunk towards its core.  In that manner the Moon could pick up mantle from the Earth that has less iron.  Most of the planetesimal itself would have sunk into the earth's core.

**The lack of iron, provided the impact of the planetesimal happened relatively late in the earth's formation and after the Earth's iron had sunk towards its core.  In that manner the Moon could pick up mantle from the Earth that has less iron.  Most of the planetesimal itself would have sunk into the earth's core.

**The similar oxygen isotope composition between the Moon and Earth could be explained by such a collision, provided the Moon were then formed from debris dislodged from the Earth by the collision.

**The similar oxygen isotope composition between the Moon and Earth could be explained by such a collision, provided the Moon were then formed from debris dislodged from the Earth by the collision.

''Scientific American'' concluded:<ref>''Id.''</ref>

''Scientific American'' concluded:<ref>''Id.''</ref>

: The details for forming the moon work out.

:Considering all the twists and turns in lunar science, nobody claims that the models are complete just yet.

== Reference ==

== Reference ==

<references/>

<references/>