Changes

9 bytes removed ,  00:36, September 2, 2008
→‎Beliefs: changed wording to be more encyclopedic
Line 74: Line 74:  
Another question asked, "Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?"  Palin replied, "Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the founding fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."   
 
Another question asked, "Are you offended by the phrase 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?"  Palin replied, "Not on your life. '''If it was good enough for the founding fathers''', it's good enough for me and I'll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance."   
   −
Liberals ignorant of the history of "under God" have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an "idiot" for it.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week</ref><ref>Liberals say that the Pledge of Allegiance wasn't written until 1892, and the phrase "under God" wasn't added until April 1951.</ref>  In fact, the phrase "under God" is from [[George Washington]] and, yes, he was a [[Founding Father]].<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2</ref>
+
Liberals ignorant of the history of "under God" have tried to ridicule Palin's remark, even calling her an "idiot" for it.<ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2008/sep/01/week</ref><ref>Liberals say that the Pledge of Allegiance wasn't written until 1892, and the phrase "under God" wasn't added until April 1951.</ref>  In fact, the phrase "under God" is from [[George Washington]] who was a [[Founding Father]].<ref>http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/264xqezm.asp?pg=2</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
106

edits