Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 300: Line 300:  
:::::::So they can be Christians, but they can't very effective Christians; do I have that right?
 
:::::::So they can be Christians, but they can't very effective Christians; do I have that right?
 
:::::::Thanks for taking the time for me, by the way.  I suspect that explaining religion to me is a challenge along the lines of explaining color to a blind man.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 13:59, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::Thanks for taking the time for me, by the way.  I suspect that explaining religion to me is a challenge along the lines of explaining color to a blind man.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 13:59, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::::::: It depends on what they are doing.  They can be effective in many ways, but if they face someone for whom "science" (i.e. ideas such as evolution) is an issue (and that's not always obvious), ''then'' they are likely to be much less effective.  And that it potentially undermines their own faith.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:41, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
    
I do not think that we necessarily need a God to decide what is "wicked." There is no reason for me to think that if you, Phillip, lost your faith, you would suddenly just go around murdering people. Of course you wouldn't!
 
I do not think that we necessarily need a God to decide what is "wicked." There is no reason for me to think that if you, Phillip, lost your faith, you would suddenly just go around murdering people. Of course you wouldn't!
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu