Changes

383 bytes added ,  14:39, September 3, 2008
Line 41: Line 41:  
::: I don't really see anything wrong with that content.  What is confusing about it?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:04, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::: I don't really see anything wrong with that content.  What is confusing about it?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:04, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::::In the UK when I was at school, a long time ago before the liberals ruined education with "modern math", it used to be the convention that X was the symbol for multiplication and x was the symbol for an unknown quantity.[[User:Malakker|Malakker]] 10:08, 3 September 2008 (EDT) (sorry, hit the wrong button first time.)[[User:Malakker|Malakker]] 10:08, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::::In the UK when I was at school, a long time ago before the liberals ruined education with "modern math", it used to be the convention that X was the symbol for multiplication and x was the symbol for an unknown quantity.[[User:Malakker|Malakker]] 10:08, 3 September 2008 (EDT) (sorry, hit the wrong button first time.)[[User:Malakker|Malakker]] 10:08, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
:::::An asterisk * is often sometimes used for multiplication (and / for division), especially on computer systems such as Microsoft Excel, although I have also seen it in printed documents as well.  I believe (although I may be wrong) that this originates from its use in early computer programming languages such as BASIC.  [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 10:39, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
560

edits