150
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + +
Agreed, and...
It seems like "highly provocative" is a euphemism for racist hate-speech. How can any responsible person condone inviting impressionable kids to visit the site, as in "Anyone who wishes to investigate Metapedia for himself is invited to do so". I'm taking this line out, and anyone who feels it's appropriate for kids to visit a hate site needs to justify it here before reverting. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:33, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
It seems like "highly provocative" is a euphemism for racist hate-speech. How can any responsible person condone inviting impressionable kids to visit the site, as in "Anyone who wishes to investigate Metapedia for himself is invited to do so". I'm taking this line out, and anyone who feels it's appropriate for kids to visit a hate site needs to justify it here before reverting. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:33, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
:Yes, I think people should be informed (read: warned) about this site ''because'' it's racism and Holocaust Denial, disguised as "just another wiki encyclopedia". However, I'm somewhat confused why our article is so extremely tame and only sorta-kinda points out the real identity of this site. The intro should really say that this is a site that pushes historical revisionism and racism.
:And I completely agree that we shouldn't encourage people to visit this site. At all. What would parents say if they discovered that their children visited a racist site? And what would they say if they were told that THIS site encouraged their kids to do so?
:I would also ask somebody with Upload rights to scrub the URL from the screenshots. It's silly to say that linking to the site is forbidden when the URL is plainly visible in apparently all images of the gallery. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 15:48, 6 September 2008 (EDT)