29
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability? (view source)
Revision as of 13:24, March 20, 2007
, 13:24, March 20, 2007no edit summary
'''Reply: There are some examples for you [[Wikipedia|here]]. Have a great day!
'''Reply: There are some examples for you [[Wikipedia|here]]. Have a great day!
--[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 15:23, 27 December 2006 (EST)'''
--[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 15:23, 27 December 2006 (EST)'''
==Catch 22==
Look at the function of the Conservapedia... It was created to represent the views of Conservative America, that was being edited out of the Wikipedia.
If bias in the Wikipedia '''does not''' affect its reliability then the Conservapedia is redundant.
If bias in the Wikipedia '''does''' affect its reliability, then creating a purposfully biased "answer to the problem" will suffer from the same problem, making it redundant (and the wikipedia).
The difference between the two is, the Wikipedia strives not to be biased, whereas this site was created to represent a certain view point, so will always be biased and always unreliable. --[[User:Mj|Mj]] 09:24, 20 March 2007 (EDT)