nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + +
Talk:Essay: Freedom of speech (view source)
Revision as of 10:02, September 10, 2008
, 10:02, September 10, 2008→Conservapedian "Free" Speech: Your complaint did prompt me
Now, my asking for a list may sound snide and dismissive, I assure you that while part of me is cynical about this rule, (and many others,) I'm still utterly confused (not to mention angered) by the unilateral and arbitrary blocking that happens here. It seems that many of the blocks are simply for having ''dissenting'' opinions. [[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 20:58, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Now, my asking for a list may sound snide and dismissive, I assure you that while part of me is cynical about this rule, (and many others,) I'm still utterly confused (not to mention angered) by the unilateral and arbitrary blocking that happens here. It seems that many of the blocks are simply for having ''dissenting'' opinions. [[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 20:58, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
: Your recent complaint did prompt me to write this, but it's an articulation of thoughts that I've had for a long time, and was not written specifically in response to you.
: Any list of banned topics would be incomplete. As far as I'm concerned (i.e. this is personal opinion; other administrators may see things differently), about the only topics that are unacceptable are ones that are not family-friendly.
: As far as disparaging police is concerned, I've explained my position on that on the abuse page. And again speaking for myself, I won't block anyone just for having a dissenting opinion.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:02, 10 September 2008 (EDT)