nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 12:57, September 11, 2008
, 12:57, September 11, 2008→Size: Agree, but...
Articles does not have to be large to be good enough. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:28, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Articles does not have to be large to be good enough. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:28, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
: I agree. However, it depends on the article. A one-paragraph article on Palin's home town might be appropriate (that's why I wasn't concerned with the length of [[Sausage]]). A one-paragraph article on the United States would not be. It's not the size itself that matters, but whether it does the subject justice. "Too short" is a euphemism for "not covering the topic adequately". [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:57, 11 September 2008 (EDT)