1,106
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:: No offence Tmtoulouse, but it is a disservice to our readers when an article makes an unattributable statement. Particularly an extreme statement, i.e. ''scientology is heavily criticized for brainwashing'' and not support the statement. It defies Commandment #1, [[The_Conservapedia_Commandments]] to ignore the situation. I understand that you think the article is fine now, but I disagree. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 13:23, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
:: No offence Tmtoulouse, but it is a disservice to our readers when an article makes an unattributable statement. Particularly an extreme statement, i.e. ''scientology is heavily criticized for brainwashing'' and not support the statement. It defies Commandment #1, [[The_Conservapedia_Commandments]] to ignore the situation. I understand that you think the article is fine now, but I disagree. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 13:23, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
:::Fine we won't use brainwashing, now everything in the article is found in the source. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 13:33, 20 March 2007 (EDT)