9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 200:
Line 200: + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 20:02, September 17, 2008
, 20:02, September 17, 2008→Improper
: Your first example is a ''defense'' of a theory of evolution, and thus tends to support my point. Given the failure of your first citation to support your point, I did not bother to look at your other two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:48, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
: Your first example is a ''defense'' of a theory of evolution, and thus tends to support my point. Given the failure of your first citation to support your point, I did not bother to look at your other two.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:48, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
what if the other two were indeed the type of articles you were asking for? [[User:Fred1776|Fred1776]] 16:02, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
==Clarification on peer review and anonymity==
==Clarification on peer review and anonymity==