3,303
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay:Big science (view source)
Revision as of 20:47, September 18, 2008
, 20:47, September 18, 2008no edit summary
A mention of Conservapedia is way over the top. This is an encyclopedia, not a press release. Also, the statement itself didn't mediate the rest of the article, it attempted to confirm the article's conclusions. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:04, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
A mention of Conservapedia is way over the top. This is an encyclopedia, not a press release. Also, the statement itself didn't mediate the rest of the article, it attempted to confirm the article's conclusions. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:04, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
: I partially agree, which is why ultimately I think moving this to Essay is the best solution (since in that scenario, we can keep the Conservapedia references). --[[User:DRamon|DRamon]] 15:09, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
: I partially agree, which is why ultimately I think moving this to Essay is the best solution (since in that scenario, we can keep the Conservapedia references). --[[User:DRamon|DRamon]] 15:09, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
==Response==
I defy the drivel contained in the posts above, contributed by overt and closet [[Liberals]] and fellow-travellers at the cesspit. The Liberal clique has revealed itself in its full, unappetising colours. If any of you dogs had any sense of decency you would come out in your open colours and resign from CP; instead, you prefer to be cancerous cells, attempting to destroy it from within. Well, you will fail, anmd what goes around, comes around. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:47, 18 September 2008 (EDT)