5
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Second, because Conservapedia content is not licensed under the GFDL, and therefore Wikipedia's GFDL license, which requires that any subsequent re-use also be GFDL-licensed, would be infringed. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:02, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Second, because Conservapedia content is not licensed under the GFDL, and therefore Wikipedia's GFDL license, which requires that any subsequent re-use also be GFDL-licensed, would be infringed. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 16:02, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
:I've removed bias from the article. Does it all need to be rewritten? --[[User:SaintRand|SaintRand]] 16:06, 20 March 2007 (EDT)