And finally (and the main reason I axed this section), there is a logical gap between this section and the one before it (which talks about how "evolutionists" credit the "survival of the fittest" principle for our ''survival'' reflexes) because all of a sudden, we have the claim that "evolutionists" credit "survival of the fittest" for the catch-old-lady reflex. Huh? This doesn't make sense. "Survival of the fittest" is hardly the only principle such reflexes are based on, which pretty much negates the point of this paragraph in its current form. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 08:11, 30 August 2008 (EDT) | And finally (and the main reason I axed this section), there is a logical gap between this section and the one before it (which talks about how "evolutionists" credit the "survival of the fittest" principle for our ''survival'' reflexes) because all of a sudden, we have the claim that "evolutionists" credit "survival of the fittest" for the catch-old-lady reflex. Huh? This doesn't make sense. "Survival of the fittest" is hardly the only principle such reflexes are based on, which pretty much negates the point of this paragraph in its current form. --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 08:11, 30 August 2008 (EDT) |