Changes

added one
Line 6: Line 6:     
:The phrase "taxation without representation" originated from Reverend Jonathan Mayhew. He used the phrase in one of his sermons because he was adamantly against the method of taxation Britain used.  (Bethany S.)
 
:The phrase "taxation without representation" originated from Reverend Jonathan Mayhew. He used the phrase in one of his sermons because he was adamantly against the method of taxation Britain used.  (Bethany S.)
 +
 +
: The phrase “taxation without representation” was used by Reverend Jonathan Mayhew in a sermon he delivered in Boston in 1750. But it is most of the time linked to James Otis, a Boston politician who said “taxation without representation is tyranny.”  It was a term used by Colonists, that summed up, in a three word phrase, that the heavy taxes that British Parliament were laying on them left and right were unfair because they were NOT being represented in Parliament during their making. Because the Colonies could not elect people for Parliament, they had absolutely no say in the matter. Because they had no say, they were left helpless against the attacks of Parliament, hungry for more money and power.  (Deborah B.)
    
'''3.  What was the Boston Tea Party?'''
 
'''3.  What was the Boston Tea Party?'''
Line 28: Line 30:     
:George Washington. Was he great, and if so, why?  George Washington was great, not only because of his accomplishments (for these alone, though great, do not set him apart), but also because of his selflessness. He chose the general good over himself when he decided against the kingship that he could have so easily claimed. Human nature and the culture that he lived in both told him to name himself king; yet he chose against doing so and in that decision essentially gave America her freedom, a freedom that we still experience to this day.  (Rachel N.)
 
:George Washington. Was he great, and if so, why?  George Washington was great, not only because of his accomplishments (for these alone, though great, do not set him apart), but also because of his selflessness. He chose the general good over himself when he decided against the kingship that he could have so easily claimed. Human nature and the culture that he lived in both told him to name himself king; yet he chose against doing so and in that decision essentially gave America her freedom, a freedom that we still experience to this day.  (Rachel N.)
 +
 +
:Do you think a jury should be able to ignore the law in order to find a defendant ‘not guilty?’?  I believe they should. Because, even if there is a law against what the accused did and he is technically ‘guilty’ of breaking it, if the law in unconstitutional or ridiculous the man isn’t guilty of a crime and therefore shouldn’t be punished for a crime. He committed the action but it wasn’t an action that should be punishment, and therefore, in a court of law seeking to either withhold or distribute punishment he would not be a man guilty of crime.  (Katie B.)
    
'''7.  Explain the meaning of the political cartoon on the right.  As with all cartoons, pay particular attention to all of its details.  Provide a rough estimate for its date.'''[[Image:Join or Die cartoon.jpg|right]]
 
'''7.  Explain the meaning of the political cartoon on the right.  As with all cartoons, pay particular attention to all of its details.  Provide a rough estimate for its date.'''[[Image:Join or Die cartoon.jpg|right]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,215

edits