Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:  
:* ''Something'' (or someone) ''must be'' eternal.  If it's not God, it might be this universe.  But science now has good reason to think that the universe is not eternal, which begs the question of who or what created the universe.  (And the universe, by the way, is known as the space/time continuum; time itself began with the universe.)  Ultimately, as you go back, the only option left is something or someone that is eternal.  And as the laws of physics don't allow for something physical to be eternal, then that something/someone must be non-physical, or spiritual.
 
:* ''Something'' (or someone) ''must be'' eternal.  If it's not God, it might be this universe.  But science now has good reason to think that the universe is not eternal, which begs the question of who or what created the universe.  (And the universe, by the way, is known as the space/time continuum; time itself began with the universe.)  Ultimately, as you go back, the only option left is something or someone that is eternal.  And as the laws of physics don't allow for something physical to be eternal, then that something/someone must be non-physical, or spiritual.
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:25, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:25, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Ok... That makes since. We cannot bound God to logic because he created it. Thanks for clearing that up.
9

edits

Navigation menu