3,303
edits
Changes
→Response
::::Academic references? HenryS, using professors and their collegiate cronies to verify science is like trying to drown a fire in gas. The article is fine the way it is going, but some of the information about it's aims should be both expanded and specified. [[User:PCarson|PCarson]] 13:55, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
::::Academic references? HenryS, using professors and their collegiate cronies to verify science is like trying to drown a fire in gas. The article is fine the way it is going, but some of the information about it's aims should be both expanded and specified. [[User:PCarson|PCarson]] 13:55, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Encyclopedia Brittanica is part of the science conspiracy? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:57, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
:::::Encyclopedia Brittanica is part of the science conspiracy? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:57, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
Big Science exists, and its malign tentacles spread across the globe. Don't deny this; it is a fact that the establishment exists to promote its liberal virews and crush dissent. By constantly damaging tghis article, you are playing into their hands. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 14:00, 1 October 2008 (EDT)