17,394
edits
Changes
mLine 32:
Line 32: − + Line 38:
Line 38: − + − +
→Religion: typo
His father commented in 1860:
His father commented in 1860:
:"It appears to me that the laws of nature are to him what revealed religion is to us, and that any wilful infraction of those laws is to him as much a sin, as to us is disbelief in what is revealed."<ref> Duncan, ''Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer,'' p 491 </ref>
:"It appears to me that the laws of nature are to him what revealed religion is to us, and that any willful infraction of those laws is to him as much a sin, as to us is disbelief in what is revealed."<ref> Duncan, ''Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer,'' p 491 </ref>
Though "he did not accept the dogmas of any creed, he was, in the truest sense, religious," said David Duncan, his closest aide. "In private life," said another friend, "he refrained from obtruding his heterodox views upon others, nor have I ever known him give utterance to any language which could possibly be construed as 'scoffing.' . The name of the Founder of Christianity always elicited his profound respect."<ref> Duncan, ''Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer,'' p 492 </ref>
Though "he did not accept the dogmas of any creed, he was, in the truest sense, religious," said David Duncan, his closest aide. "In private life," said another friend, "he refrained from obtruding his heterodox views upon others, nor have I ever known him give utterance to any language which could possibly be construed as 'scoffing.' . The name of the Founder of Christianity always elicited his profound respect."<ref> Duncan, ''Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer,'' p 492 </ref>
Spencer, like many scientists of the time, was a [[deist]], which is to say he did not believe in a personal [[God]] ''per se'', but only in ''a'' god. In ''The Principles of Sociology'' (1876) and ''The Principles of Ethics'' (1879) he claims to have discovered the evolution of religious belief and institutions from what their origins in the cult of ancestors by primitive peoples to his own conception of an "unknowable" God-like First Cause.
Spencer, like many scientists of the time, was a [[deist]], which is to say he did not believe in a personal [[God]] ''per se'', but only in ''a'' god. In ''The Principles of Sociology'' (1876) and ''The Principles of Ethics'' (1879) he claims to have discovered the evolution of religious belief and institutions from what their origins in the cult of ancestors by primitive peoples to his own conception of an "unknowable" God-like First Cause.
Eventually, Spencer became an [[agnostic]] in the sense he could not describe God, but was sure something like God esisted.
Eventually, Spencer became an [[agnostic]] in the sense he could not describe God, but was sure something like God existed.
Spencer said the longstanding disputes between science and religion were based on a misunderstanding and failure to see the logical boundaries between the "Knowable" and the "Unknowable." Everything in the "Knowable" sphere belonged to science, he argued, while everything in the "Unknowable" sphere belonged to religion, including the existence of God.
Spencer said the longstanding disputes between science and religion were based on a misunderstanding and failure to see the logical boundaries between the "Knowable" and the "Unknowable." Everything in the "Knowable" sphere belonged to science, he argued, while everything in the "Unknowable" sphere belonged to religion, including the existence of God.
==Influence==
==Influence==