Changes

I have seen what he is doing.  He is adding AD to dates that cannot be determined as otherwise.  Dates in reference to Andrew Jackson ''do not'' need AD.  He is most probably making sarcastic edits in light of our example of wikipedia bias page which contains the bias they have against AD and BC.  Future edits like this from him ''will'' result in blocking.  If he will put AD in places where it is appropriate and cannot be taken as mockery, then I will certainly not block him.  --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 22:43, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

I have seen what he is doing.  He is adding AD to dates that cannot be determined as otherwise.  Dates in reference to Andrew Jackson ''do not'' need AD.  He is most probably making sarcastic edits in light of our example of wikipedia bias page which contains the bias they have against AD and BC.  Future edits like this from him ''will'' result in blocking.  If he will put AD in places where it is appropriate and cannot be taken as mockery, then I will certainly not block him.  --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 22:43, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

== Conservapedia article ==

== Conservapedia article ==

Please see the discussion at [[Talk:Conservapedia]]...  Feel free to semi-protect or fully protect the article, but it has a number of backlinks expecting to go to a page describing the wiki, rather than showing the wiki itself (much like the [[Wikipedia]] page briefly describes Wikipedia, rather than redirecting to Wikipedia's main page).  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 22:41, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

Please see the discussion at [[Talk:Conservapedia]]...  Feel free to semi-protect or fully protect the article, but it has a number of backlinks expecting to go to a page describing the wiki, rather than showing the wiki itself (much like the [[Wikipedia]] page briefly describes Wikipedia, rather than redirecting to Wikipedia's main page).  --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 22:41, 20 March 2007 (EDT)