Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
827 bytes added ,  21:52, October 12, 2008
Line 223: Line 223:     
:: To summarize, you're saying that those targeted by Coulter's comments feign offense as a form of censorship (which is valid, but seems like it would be hard to prove), but then you argue that there are people who are offended and are not acting in retaliation - fellow conservatives, who actually turn away from the ideology itself. I'm confused.
 
:: To summarize, you're saying that those targeted by Coulter's comments feign offense as a form of censorship (which is valid, but seems like it would be hard to prove), but then you argue that there are people who are offended and are not acting in retaliation - fellow conservatives, who actually turn away from the ideology itself. I'm confused.
 +
 +
The point I'm trying to make is that Coulter is often a little overstated and hyperbolic in her attacks, thus it would seem logical that those on the receiving ends of those attacks would feign their offence.  Honestly, I think Coulter has put herself in a position where a lot of people won't and don't take her very seriously.  I agree that many people on this website might proactively agree with her, but then again (judging by comments made above) many also don't.  The Conservapedia readership represents such a small demographic of the population and doesn't accurately represent overall views of Ms. Coulter.  As for turning Republicans against their own party, look at how much more liberal a guy like...say...Tucker Carlson has gotten in the last few years.  At any rate, all just observations... [[User:AcWellman]]
    
== Not a big fan (remark) ==
 
== Not a big fan (remark) ==
35

edits

Navigation menu