111
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 133:
Line 133: − +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 16:16, October 22, 2008
, 16:16, October 22, 2008→Amendment Recommendation
That said, what's our purpose? It seems to me that we should be collecting information, research, and data that falls in at least one of only two categories:
That said, what's our purpose? It seems to me that we should be collecting information, research, and data that falls in at least one of only two categories:
1) Info that will help us promote the conservative view, and
1) Info that will help us promote the conservative view, and <br>
2) info that will help us bring damage to and discredit the left's ambitions.
2) info that will help us bring damage to and discredit the left's ambitions.
Any info which lies outside of these two categories may be interesting, and even accurate; but why would it belong in Conservapedia? I mean, are we seriously trying to compete with Wikipedia as some alternative yet "neutral" warehouse of encyclopedic info? I mean, it'd be great if I saw an article on here about how to change a tire or the chemical composition of a sponge. But of course, given the name, this would seem to be a big waste of effort, given our limited resources. Perhaps we can amend the Commandments to direct all future efforts to allow only the two categories of info I just mentioned? If there's a third that's equally important, I'd like to hear what that is. I'm open to revisions... [[User:Alexander|Alexander]] 12:15, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
Any info which lies outside of these two categories may be interesting, and even accurate; but why would it belong in Conservapedia? I mean, are we seriously trying to compete with Wikipedia as some alternative yet "neutral" warehouse of encyclopedic info? I mean, it'd be great if I saw an article on here about how to change a tire or the chemical composition of a sponge. But of course, given the name, this would seem to be a big waste of effort, given our limited resources. Perhaps we can amend the Commandments to direct all future efforts to allow only the two categories of info I just mentioned? If there's a third that's equally important, I'd like to hear what that is. I'm open to revisions... [[User:Alexander|Alexander]] 12:15, 22 October 2008 (EDT)