Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 134: Line 134:     
1) Info that will help us promote the conservative view, and <br>
 
1) Info that will help us promote the conservative view, and <br>
2) info that will help us bring damage to and discredit the left's ambitions.   
+
2) info that will help us bring damage to and discredit the left's ideas and ambitions.   
    
Any info which lies outside of these two categories may be interesting, and even accurate; but why would it belong in Conservapedia? I mean, are we seriously trying to compete with Wikipedia as some alternative yet "neutral" warehouse of encyclopedic info?  I mean, it'd be great if I saw an article on here about how to change a tire or the chemical composition of a sponge.  But of course, given the name, this would seem to be a big waste of effort, given our limited resources.  Perhaps we can amend the Commandments to direct all future efforts to allow only the two categories of info I just mentioned?  If there's a third that's equally important, I'd like to hear what that is.  I'm open to revisions... [[User:Alexander|Alexander]] 12:15, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
 
Any info which lies outside of these two categories may be interesting, and even accurate; but why would it belong in Conservapedia? I mean, are we seriously trying to compete with Wikipedia as some alternative yet "neutral" warehouse of encyclopedic info?  I mean, it'd be great if I saw an article on here about how to change a tire or the chemical composition of a sponge.  But of course, given the name, this would seem to be a big waste of effort, given our limited resources.  Perhaps we can amend the Commandments to direct all future efforts to allow only the two categories of info I just mentioned?  If there's a third that's equally important, I'd like to hear what that is.  I'm open to revisions... [[User:Alexander|Alexander]] 12:15, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
111

edits

Navigation menu