221
edits
Changes
→Better article elsewhere
I've tidied up the minute amount of content to make it at least of ''some'' use. However there's a far better article at Wikipedia that readers should check instead. There's no point in duplicating the good, referenced work done over there. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 19:54, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
I've tidied up the minute amount of content to make it at least of ''some'' use. However there's a far better article at Wikipedia that readers should check instead. There's no point in duplicating the good, referenced work done over there. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 19:54, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:That's sort of the entire point of this encyclopedia. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:55, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
:That's sort of the entire point of this encyclopedia. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:55, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
::Are you suggesting that the Wikipedia article is effectively useless? I think there's every reason to use wikis, so long as the articles are well referenced, as that one is. This article is hardly core values Conservapedia material, hence why publish a weaker article? [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 19:57, 22 October 2008 (EDT)