Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Statistical Approach: actually I had too many double negatives; this is correct now
Line 21: Line 21:  
== Statistical Approach ==
 
== Statistical Approach ==
   −
If there is merely a 5% chance that any of the foregoing counterexamples is correct, then the odds of at least one of them being correct is at least 49%.<ref>At 14 examples each with a 5% probability of being correct, then the odds of at least one being correct is 0.95<sup>14</sup> = 0.49 = 49%</ref>  As the list grows longer, the odds become vanishingly small of the theory of evolution being valid.
+
If there is a 5% chance or greater that any of the foregoing counterexamples is correct, then the odds of at least one of them being correct is at least 51%.<ref>At 14 examples each with a 5% probability of being correct, then the odds of at least one being correct are <math>1-0.95^{{14}} = 0.51 = 51%</math></ref>  As the list grows longer, the odds become vanishingly small of the theory of evolution being valid.<ref>For their to be greater than a 95% chance of at least one event being correct, you would need 58 independent examples, each with a 5% chance of being correct, as <math>1-0.95^{{58}} = 0.95 = 95%</math></ref>
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
5,580

edits

Navigation menu