Changes

no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
::The two books have many themes in common, including playing up an outside threat to seize or retain power.  How is it that one's con and the other's lib?--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 12:25, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::The two books have many themes in common, including playing up an outside threat to seize or retain power.  How is it that one's con and the other's lib?--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 12:25, 29 October 2008 (EDT)
 
Ok, so this was in an edit, but not on this page, but I want to raise the issue anyway.  How is The Moon is a Harsh Mistress not conservative?  The statement of TANSTAAFL (There ain't no such thing as a free lunch) is best statement of the bedrock of conservatism I've ever heard.[[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 11:27, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
 
Ok, so this was in an edit, but not on this page, but I want to raise the issue anyway.  How is The Moon is a Harsh Mistress not conservative?  The statement of TANSTAAFL (There ain't no such thing as a free lunch) is best statement of the bedrock of conservatism I've ever heard.[[User:ArnoldFriend|ArnoldFriend]] 11:27, 30 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Ayn Rand's novels may have some conservative themes, but she was an outspoken atheist, and this is reflected in at least some of her work, especially ''Atlas Shrugged''.
67

edits