Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 18:09, November 3, 2008
, 18:09, November 3, 2008let's expose the fakes
:: I saw it and would give it 1 star, its a really bad movie full of slander and factual errors and dishonest editing. When I saw it I was one of 10 people in the theater and they all booed at it during the movie, these were people I didn't go with. PZ never asked anyone to lie in there review he asked people who have seen the movie to give it an honest review, if he was intent on crashing it he would have asked for it and there would be a few thousand 1 stars by the end of the day. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:53, 3 November 2008 (EST)
:: I saw it and would give it 1 star, its a really bad movie full of slander and factual errors and dishonest editing. When I saw it I was one of 10 people in the theater and they all booed at it during the movie, these were people I didn't go with. PZ never asked anyone to lie in there review he asked people who have seen the movie to give it an honest review, if he was intent on crashing it he would have asked for it and there would be a few thousand 1 stars by the end of the day. --[[User:Brendanw|Brendanw]] 12:53, 3 November 2008 (EST)
I wouldn't worry about the phone reviews. Most of the important conservative books are victims of ballot-stuffing. It doesn't really sway anybody.
That's why people come here to find out what's really going on. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:09, 3 November 2008 (EST)