102
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
Talk:Homosexual Historical Revisionism (view source)
Revision as of 12:32, November 11, 2008
, 12:32, November 11, 2008no edit summary
::Correction: I misread. Apparently, it was a different Schlafly, but I'm sure the same applies: this was just a liberal smear that would indicate that anyone was accusing any Schlafly of perversion, even though the intent was that John was not homosexual. Backhanded smears are common [[liberal style]].
::Correction: I misread. Apparently, it was a different Schlafly, but I'm sure the same applies: this was just a liberal smear that would indicate that anyone was accusing any Schlafly of perversion, even though the intent was that John was not homosexual. Backhanded smears are common [[liberal style]].
::Even if I am wrong, it's just more evidence that liberals love to accuse prominent conservatives of homosexuality, especially if they share a name or lineage with other prominent conservatives like [[Aschlafly]]. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 00:04, 11 November 2008 (EST)
::Even if I am wrong, it's just more evidence that liberals love to accuse prominent conservatives of homosexuality, especially if they share a name or lineage with other prominent conservatives like [[Aschlafly]]. [[User:BHarlan|BHarlan]] 00:04, 11 November 2008 (EST)
:::You are right BHarlan, that is why I started this article. Homosexual activists try to appropriate our history by blithely making these outrageous claims that "so and so was gay" with no evidence. This article is designed to highlight, and counter, their ridiculous assertions.--[[User:Saxplayer|Saxplayer]] 07:32, 11 November 2008 (EST)