5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − The bible is the best selling science fiction book ever made. It was written by a large cult of mentally retarded ancients, who had no idea how anything in the world functioned, from thousands of years ago. Sadly, however, idiocy has survived throughout time and many people still believe in the illogical sh1t spewed from page to page. As such, it may be the single greatest example of trolling, unintentional or not, and perhaps the longest edit war that the world has ever seen.+ + − Probably the oldest of old media, the Bible is a sprawling epic that spans thousands of years. It is part creation myth and part war story, as well as romance, adventure, drama, comedy, amateur pornography and completely irrelevant history. Although everyone knows corrupt Iranian Jews made most of the sh1t up to troll the Egyptian and Israeli Jews.+ − The main character of the book is God, who is actually a race of super-intelligent extra-terrestrials who make up ridiculous rules just for the lulz.+ − The book is divided into two parts, the Old Testament, and the New Testament. Most scholars agree that the Old Testament is the real deal, while the New Testament is fan fiction, written because there was no proper sequel in sight.+ − George Bush uses a mixture of The Bible and Mein Kampf for the basis of his politics. See also Hitler, fascism, Nazis, and stupidity.+ − Contents+ − (EDT)+ + + + + + + + + + +
Debate:Why the Bible (view source)
Revision as of 05:36, November 17, 2008
, 05:36, November 17, 2008Undo revision 560335 by Amantine2 (Talk)
==Nothing==
==Nothing==
There is no evidence that the Bible is more trustworthy than any other piece of literature. The Bible is merely a fictional novel which has traditionally been believed and baselessly seen as the infallible word of God for hundreds of generations.
-Helios
What idiot puts page-long geniologies in a novel??!! Whether the bible is true or not (as I know it is) the ''authors'' seemed to think it's true. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 07:58, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Agreed. I think it was made by some men wanting to show people morals and values, like Aesop fables.
While some Biblical events may be confirmable by more scientific-based types of knowledge, belief in most of the Bible is contingent on faith. Nothing more, nothing less. Take that for what it's worth. [[User:Jacobin|Jacobin]] 19:44, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
"Take that for what it's worth."-Ooooo... I get a free Bible. -Helios
I will watch this discussion and see when it gets deleted. There seems to be a concerted effort at policing even these debate areas. [[User:Seekcommon|Seekcommon]] 19:34 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Hmmm... if we consider the New Testament as Bible 2.0, then would the Koran be Bible 3.0 or Bible 2.1? And where does this leave the Book of Mormon? 4.0? 3.1? 2.2? 3.1.1? --[[User:AppalledBystander|AppalledBystander]] 07:32, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
Well since Christianity actually branched off of Judaism the '''Old''' Testament would be v2.0 -Helios
The bible has been put together by hundreds of authors, over the course of around 900 years, and has subsequently been translated (several times), re-written and "improved" by many other hundreds of contributers and writers since. To put any kind of significance upon it at all is at best misguided and at worst plain idiotic. That is not to say that there are some good messages in there, however the majority is just plain weird. [[User:Bolly Ottihw|Bolly Ottihw]] 21:02, 19 April 2007
If a book was made today and was said to be the work of god, would you believe it? The world isn't as small as it used to be. Chris
You guys are right, the bible is total garbage.[[User:Rebiu|Rebiu]] 23:01, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
==2Nihilism==
==2Nihilism==