AddisonDM

I must express disaproval at the tone of our "Barack Obama" article. Yes, there are reasonable questions about him, and plenty of room to disagree with him, but I think the article is closer to a hitjob than a reasonable explanation. At least one claim, that he might use a Koran for swearing in, violates our own Conservapedia Commandments (the true and verifiable one) and the Manual of Style for Politicans, which discourages: Speculation on what may or may not happen to them in the future, gossip, your opinion of the politician and unsourced, possibly contentious facts.

I must express disaproval at the tone of our "Barack Obama" article. Yes, there are reasonable questions about him, and plenty of room to disagree with him, but I think the article is closer to a hitjob than a reasonable explanation. At least one claim, that he might use a Koran for swearing in, violates our own Conservapedia Commandments (the true and verifiable one) and the Manual of Style for Politicans, which discourages: Speculation on what may or may not happen to them in the future, gossip, your opinion of the politician and unsourced, possibly contentious facts.

I notice Mr. Schalfly said that no one against the different tests in History class quoted the Bible. True. How about this: "...There is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:28)  

I notice Mr. Schalfly said that no one against the different tests in History class quoted the Bible. True. How about this: "...There is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:28)