Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Personal remarks: vs. comments which are actually about the article
Line 1,101: Line 1,101:     
Well "way to do it is to retract and apologise" is mine, and it was not a personal remark.  In context (i.e. the rest of the sentence ''at least''), I was saying that if an editor wanted to back away from remarks made about and objected to by another editor, then the "way to do it is to retract and apologise" rather than retroactively qualify the remarks.[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 18:16, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 
Well "way to do it is to retract and apologise" is mine, and it was not a personal remark.  In context (i.e. the rest of the sentence ''at least''), I was saying that if an editor wanted to back away from remarks made about and objected to by another editor, then the "way to do it is to retract and apologise" rather than retroactively qualify the remarks.[[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 18:16, 25 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:And this is related to Barack Obama in what way? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:26, 25 November 2008 (EST)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu