nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 137:
Line 137: − + + +
Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll (view source)
Revision as of 00:52, December 3, 2008
, 00:52, December 3, 2008→It is time to end this foolish endeavor. Now.
:: An interesting thought. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 19:04, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:: An interesting thought. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 19:04, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::;As the saying goes, "very interesting, but a term that Ed Poor would rightly declare provocative". The scenario is incredible. If he is Muslim, and has been hiding it, he would hardly 'come out' at his inauguration. If he is not, he wouldn't use a Koran anyway. The likelihood - nay, certainty - that he won't use a Koran proves precisely zero. And we - that is, the 'posse' - are already compromising. It is the invisible clique that wishes to censor opposing opinion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 19:39, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::As the saying goes, "very interesting, but a term that Ed Poor would rightly declare provocative". The scenario is incredible. If he is Muslim, and has been hiding it, he would hardly 'come out' at his inauguration. If he is not, he wouldn't use a Koran anyway. The likelihood - nay, certainty - that he won't use a Koran proves precisely zero. And we - that is, the 'posse' - are already compromising. It is the invisible clique that wishes to censor opposing opinion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 19:39, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::Ok, that's fine, that's why I added "Or something along those lines". If you don't like those parameters then suggest others. The reason I'm putting this idea forward is that I have seen no attempt at compromise yet and I thought it might be worthwhile. Surely it would be better to come to an arrangement that, while not making the Obama article ideal for either side, would avoid the risk of long term rifts that could damage the future of conservapedia. --[[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 19:46, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::Ok, that's fine, that's why I added "Or something along those lines". If you don't like those parameters then suggest others. The reason I'm putting this idea forward is that I have seen no attempt at compromise yet and I thought it might be worthwhile. Surely it would be better to come to an arrangement that, while not making the Obama article ideal for either side, would avoid the risk of long term rifts that could damage the future of conservapedia. --[[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 19:46, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::*[http://www.amazon.com/Day-Reckoning-Ideology-Tearing-America/dp/0312376960 The Day of Reckoning: How Hubris, Ideology, and Greed Are Tearing America Apart] I don't see ''anything good coming from all this'', but then I repeat myself. It will be the doing of the ''False Prophet'' and its assembled Demons, as to the next step. Bolly, I for one, appreciate your effort at some sort of compromise, but I am afraid that Rubicon was crossed long ago, with continued reverts and argument without end. But I live with hope! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 19:52, 2 December 2008 (EST)