1,660
edits
Changes
Talk:Post-Diluvian Diasporas (view source)
Revision as of 18:32, March 22, 2007
, 18:32, March 22, 2007no edit summary
:If you can't question it, and it cannot ever be known, it is not science, and therefore falls under the heading of beliefs.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:20, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
:If you can't question it, and it cannot ever be known, it is not science, and therefore falls under the heading of beliefs.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:20, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
::Yes, for it to be science it must - at lest in theory - be possible to disprove it. What would you accept as disproof of this idea? --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 14:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
::Yes, for it to be science it must - at lest in theory - be possible to disprove it. What would you accept as disproof of this idea? --[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 14:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
:I'll accept any statement a creationist can give me that, if it were found to be true, would disprove creationism. It doesn't have to be true, just potentially true. Disprovable doesnt equal disproved.
Also, the whole comment about Krakatoa doesnt make any sense. It should probably be rewritten, but im not the guy to do it.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:32, 22 March 2007 (EDT)