Changes

no edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:     
::There is no need to insult Duns.  It is not the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. I would not argue that recovery after a Noachian flood would be impossible. Catastrophic, nearly life-ending events have happened many times in Earth's history, and life is amazingly resilient. Of course God works in mysterious ways, but he gave us the tools to examine the natural world, so if we can't ask difficult questions, then we were not created in his image.  [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:45, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::There is no need to insult Duns.  It is not the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. I would not argue that recovery after a Noachian flood would be impossible. Catastrophic, nearly life-ending events have happened many times in Earth's history, and life is amazingly resilient. Of course God works in mysterious ways, but he gave us the tools to examine the natural world, so if we can't ask difficult questions, then we were not created in his image.  [[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 14:45, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Thanks Palmd001!! I agree that even the secularists posit species survival after the (several) mass extinction events, but that in general, the thought that the Almighty would actively seek death for a majority of species on the Earth not once, but several times, is altogether unbearable, and irreconcilable with scriptural evidence of His Grace and Providence. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 14:51, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
     
153

edits