604
edits
Changes
→Deleted: not elementary, dear Watson, but necessary
Take it to Citizendium or Wikipedia. We don't need arcane stuff like this. First, write an article on how to prove a [[theorem]] in [[geometry]] or [[symbolic logic]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:18, 4 December 2008 (EST)
Take it to Citizendium or Wikipedia. We don't need arcane stuff like this. First, write an article on how to prove a [[theorem]] in [[geometry]] or [[symbolic logic]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:18, 4 December 2008 (EST)
:Arcane stuff like what? The article's gone. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:47, 4 December 2008 (EST)
:Arcane stuff like what? The article's gone. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 12:47, 4 December 2008 (EST)
::Granted, the AC isn't trivial stuff, but it should have it place here, especially as quite a few sites link to it:
* Pierre de Fermat (← links)
* Fermat's Last Theorem (← links)
* Mathematics (← links)
* Well-Ordering Theorem (← links)
* Lebesgue measurable (← links)
* Axiom of choice (redirect page) (← links)
o Tychonoff theorem (← links)
o Countable (← links)
o Talk:Fermat's Last Theorem (← links)
o User talk:Aschlafly/Archive34 (← links)
o User:SamHB/Mathematical paradoxes (← links)
* Real analysis (← links)
* User talk:RSchlafly/Archive1 (← links)
* Conservapedia:Critical Thinking in Math (← links)
* Constructive proof (← links)
* Banach-Tarski Paradox (← links)
* Mathematical formula (← links)
* Algebraic closure (← links)
* User talk:Aschlafly/Archive34 (← links)
* User talk:Foxtrot (← links)
* Proof by induction (← links)
* Axiom of empty set (← links)
* Forcing (← links)
* Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive11 (← links)
* Undecidable (← links)
* Zermelo-Fraenkel (← links)
And A. Schlafly shows an interest in the AC - it is part of the proposed program of "critical thinking in math": This shows that it should be accessible for interested laymen, whom this course targets. The whole debate about elementary vs. non-elementary proofs cannot be understood without it.
Please restore it. --[[User:BRichtigen|BRichtigen]] 15:37, 4 December 2008 (EST)