Changes

55 bytes added ,  23:06, December 4, 2008
Technical correction regarding Coase's Nobel Prize - the Prize in Economics is actually not a "Nobel Prize"
Line 5: Line 5:  
:thought the work we were doing was disreputable. They thought of us as right- wing extremists. My wife was at a cocktail party and heard me described as someone to the right of the [[John Birch Society]]. There was a great antagonism in the '50s and '60s to anyone who saw any advantage in a market system or in a nonregulated or relatively economically free system.
 
:thought the work we were doing was disreputable. They thought of us as right- wing extremists. My wife was at a cocktail party and heard me described as someone to the right of the [[John Birch Society]]. There was a great antagonism in the '50s and '60s to anyone who saw any advantage in a market system or in a nonregulated or relatively economically free system.
   −
Coase received some vindication by the scientific establishment when he was the sole recipient of the [[Nobel Prize]] in 1991 for his theorem.  In addition to his theorem, Coase also criticized licensing of the radio spectrum, and wrote a paper "The Federal Communications Commission" (1959) proposing that property rights is a more efficient method of allocating the electromagnetic spectrum.
+
Coase received some vindication by the scientific establishment when he was the sole recipient of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel
 +
in 1991 for his theorem.  In addition to his theorem, Coase also criticized licensing of the radio spectrum, and wrote a paper "The Federal Communications Commission" (1959) proposing that property rights is a more efficient method of allocating the electromagnetic spectrum.
    
Reason magazine published an enlightening interview of Coase in the late 1990s.<ref>http://www.reason.com/news/show/30115.html</ref>
 
Reason magazine published an enlightening interview of Coase in the late 1990s.<ref>http://www.reason.com/news/show/30115.html</ref>