Changes

Line 442: Line 442:     
:An unauthorized group is exactly that.  It deserves no credibility, and has no connection with, the main group.  An entry on an unauthorized group, but there is no reason to connect it with a group that disavows it.  Make sense?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:04, 8 December 2008 (EST)
 
:An unauthorized group is exactly that.  It deserves no credibility, and has no connection with, the main group.  An entry on an unauthorized group, but there is no reason to connect it with a group that disavows it.  Make sense?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:04, 8 December 2008 (EST)
 +
::What you say makes sense, but I disagree. Explaining the lack of connection is important to make the existence of splinter groups known so that they are -not- confused with the real thing. As is it leaves the interpretation very open to error. [[User:PeytonJ|PeytonJ]] 15:16, 8 December 2008 (EST)
    
I agree. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 15:08, 8 December 2008 (EST)
 
I agree. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 15:08, 8 December 2008 (EST)
25

edits