Changes

no edit summary
Line 1,516: Line 1,516:     
I strongly suspect that this is going to wind up being a new section of the article as the story develops.  After all, when Blagojevich says that he's not willing to support Obama's pick because "they're not willing to give me anything except appreciation," that rather strongly implies that he ASKED them what they were willing to give.  If that's the case, the fact that they weren't willing to grease his palm is really irrelevant; they knew a serious crime was being committed and said nothing about it, which would make them party to said crime.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:45, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 
I strongly suspect that this is going to wind up being a new section of the article as the story develops.  After all, when Blagojevich says that he's not willing to support Obama's pick because "they're not willing to give me anything except appreciation," that rather strongly implies that he ASKED them what they were willing to give.  If that's the case, the fact that they weren't willing to grease his palm is really irrelevant; they knew a serious crime was being committed and said nothing about it, which would make them party to said crime.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:45, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
==Flag Pin==
 +
 +
This site isn't exactly the Harvard Law Review, but I would hope that cited authorities actually justify the claims they are offered to support. I searched the CBS link for anything remotely suggesting that Obama stopped wearing a flag pin to appease anti-military supporters and found nothing. If you insist on cobbling this article together with original research, please don't try to pretend that it's based on citations to other sources.
3

edits