4,542
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 02:29, March 23, 2007
, 02:29, March 23, 2007→A good wiki rule - no personal attacks
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks No personal attacks]. As this site grows and more people with different interpretations of source material join, it would be proper to put down a rule regarding personal attacks. As has recently been seen, this can can be very disruptive to the communication between editors, makes people who have positive contributions less likely to join and presents a poor image of conservapedia to the world. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:28, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks No personal attacks]. As this site grows and more people with different interpretations of source material join, it would be proper to put down a rule regarding personal attacks. As has recently been seen, this can can be very disruptive to the communication between editors, makes people who have positive contributions less likely to join and presents a poor image of conservapedia to the world. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:28, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:I think this is a no-brainer, as Argumentum ad Hominem provides absolutely no value to any discussion. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:29, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
== rule # 6==
== rule # 6==
why is this rule not enforced? 20:15, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
why is this rule not enforced? 20:15, 21 March 2007 (EDT)