Changes

308 bytes added ,  19:41, December 30, 2008
no edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:     
DinsdaleP has once again found a more eloquent and effective way of communicating what I was trying to say. Thank you Dinsdale! Perhaps my wording was a bit off and too generalizing. I think with a few edits to the wording to stress a)the purpose of the study b)the population used c)the impact of the study that this will be a useful contribution to the CP infostock. --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 14:13, 30 December 2008 (EST)
 
DinsdaleP has once again found a more eloquent and effective way of communicating what I was trying to say. Thank you Dinsdale! Perhaps my wording was a bit off and too generalizing. I think with a few edits to the wording to stress a)the purpose of the study b)the population used c)the impact of the study that this will be a useful contribution to the CP infostock. --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 14:13, 30 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:The difficulty is that the original study was for those who pledged to wait until marriage -- regardless of past choices.  They are then compared to those who actually had not had sexual relations.  The comparison is apples and oranges. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:41, 30 December 2008 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits