Changes

== Grammar/Flow ==

== Grammar/Flow ==

I feel this is most important, if this project is intended to be an alternative to biased, liberal information sources; such as Wikipedia, it needs to read well. Part of the difficulty is that Wikipedia attracts a lot of "random editors" who will fix up a sentence or two, just because they're there and they don't like bad flow, or a particular typo, or whatnot, which means that most popular articles are quickly brought up to a certain standard of acceptability.  If we don't pay attention to this facet of the Conservapedia experience, a random viewer who lands here could see a buggy sentence, and scoff at the entire project, because of one editor's careless writing, and fail to further investigate the valuable resource in front of them, because the first entry they experience looks un-encyclopedic.

I feel this is most important, if this project is intended to be an alternative to biased, liberal information sources; such as Wikipedia, it needs to read well. Part of the difficulty is that Wikipedia attracts a lot of "random editors" who will fix up a sentence or two, just because they're there and they don't like bad flow, or a particular typo, or whatnot, which means that most popular articles are quickly brought up to a certain standard of acceptability.  If we don't pay attention to this facet of the Conservapedia experience, a random viewer who lands here could see a buggy sentence, and scoff at the entire project, because of one editor's careless writing, and fail to further investigate the valuable resource in front of them, because the first entry they experience looks un-encyclopedic. So let's keep cleaning up.

My apologies if this belongs on the Talk page. But this is very, VERY, necessary. [[User:JakeW|JakeWilde]]

My apologies if this belongs on the Talk page. But this is very, VERY, necessary. [[User:JakeW|JakeWilde]]