nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
more on rabbits (and giants)
:::These "scientists" are welcome to submit their discovery of Carboniferous rabbits if they find them. It would directly contradict everything we thought we knew about evolution and geology. If the flood "model" is correct, we ought to be able to find such inconsistancies (and where are the giants?). [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 12:08, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:::These "scientists" are welcome to submit their discovery of Carboniferous rabbits if they find them. It would directly contradict everything we thought we knew about evolution and geology. If the flood "model" is correct, we ought to be able to find such inconsistancies (and where are the giants?). [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 12:08, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::::Thanks for maligning scientists who's views you disagree with, by using quote marks to subtly questioning whether they really are scientists. How about a bit of respect?
::::You appear to have missed my point about the rabbits. If rabbits were found in carboniferous sediments, I suspect that geologists would reclassify it to not be carboniferous, thereby denying that rabbits ''were'' found in carboniferous sediments. Besides, the creation model wouldn't predict rabbits there either. As for the giants, how many were there? Not everything has a preserved example, particularly if the population was small. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:15, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
: The link follows, Philip. Remember to keep an open mind. Behold, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG#Creationism| the truth] shall set you free.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
: The link follows, Philip. Remember to keep an open mind. Behold, for [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG#Creationism| the truth] shall set you free.-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:22, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::Finding the section wasn't the problem, it was finding a treatment that was "good". ;-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
::Finding the section wasn't the problem, it was finding a treatment that was "good". ;-) [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:03, 23 March 2007 (EDT)