We should link to the full text of the decision, but putting it ''in'' the page seems over-the-top. I'll add an external link. And I think it is important to mention the serious judicial activism that took place in making this ruling. [[User:NTemple|NTemple]] 23.05 16 December 2008 (EST)
+
:It is not "over the top" to have the full text of this decision within this article. Unless you have a valid argument for removing it, it stays. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:30, 3 January 2009 (EST)