239
edits
Changes
mLine 42:
Line 42: − +
→Is there a cite: sp
:::--[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 01:34, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::--[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 01:34, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
::Very good point. The reality is this: Professor Cole and Professor Newman (two potential witnesses the court refused to allow to testify) mentioned Piltdown Man in their affidavits, but in neither case did they show much enthusiasm. Piltdown Man ''is not'' in the textbook. (Note, this is from [http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/tenness5.html#pm], a sire devoted to trashing ''Civic Biology''.
::Very good point. The reality is this: Professor Cole and Professor Newman (two potential witnesses the court refused to allow to testify) mentioned Piltdown Man in their affidavits, but in neither case did they show much enthusiasm. Piltdown Man ''is not'' in the textbook. (Note, this is from [http://www.bradburyac.mistral.co.uk/tenness5.html#pm], a site devoted to trashing ''Civic Biology''.
::Andy, you need to retract the statement if you wish Conservapedia to be "accurate" (not that this article is very accurate anyway, but...) [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:31, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
::Andy, you need to retract the statement if you wish Conservapedia to be "accurate" (not that this article is very accurate anyway, but...) [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:31, 22 March 2007 (EDT)