nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW
461
edits
Changes
Talk:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 18:49, January 7, 2009
, 18:49, January 7, 2009no edit summary
MylesP myles325@yahoo.com.au 6 April, 2006 (why don't my name show up in blue like everyone else's)
MylesP myles325@yahoo.com.au 6 April, 2006 (why don't my name show up in blue like everyone else's)
:Myles, you've got to press the signature button at the top of the edit window. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 09:58, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:Myles, you've got to press the signature button at the top of the edit window. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 09:58, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
There's alot of AIDS related images on many of the homosexuality articles, but none on the actual AIDS article. Perhaps some should be added here as well? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:21, 24 November 2007 (EST)
There's alot of AIDS related images on many of the homosexuality articles, but none on the actual AIDS article. Perhaps some should be added here as well? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:21, 24 November 2007 (EST)
==HIV==
The problem is the HIV virus has never actually been identified or isolated.--[[User:AlexC|AlexC]] 12:16, 7 January 2009 (EST)
:This is false AlexC, HIV has been identified and isolated for almost 2 decades. I believe you are inferring that detection of infection is based on antibody detection and that the actual virus has not been isolated. This is false however; isolating the virus is not hard but is not used for detection of infection. There are many protocols for HIV isolation using different media and the structure of HIV was determined using electron microscopy, which can only be done with an identified and isolated specimen.--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 13:49, 7 January 2009 (EST)