121
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + + Line 26:
Line 31: − +
no edit summary
I think I might be breaking the 90/10 rule of talk and contributions, but I just like to read and maybe point out mistakes. I don't know enought to write whole articles (except maybe a few biology ones), plus I have a severe lack of sources (I read things and remember them, but not where they were or what book it was). Plus I have a slight fear of all edits being bowled over as I am liberal.
I think I might be breaking the 90/10 rule of talk and contributions, but I just like to read and maybe point out mistakes. I don't know enought to write whole articles (except maybe a few biology ones), plus I have a severe lack of sources (I read things and remember them, but not where they were or what book it was). Plus I have a slight fear of all edits being bowled over as I am liberal.
Saving for later <nowiki>{{Essay by|Username of author (if more than one author, leave blank)}}
Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Essays"
</nowiki>
{{userboxtop|Steve's Summary}}
{{userboxtop|Steve's Summary}}
**Do people that want to be together have the right to be? You better bet.
**Do people that want to be together have the right to be? You better bet.
*Do I trust [[Richard Nixon]] more than [[Ronald Reagan]] and [[George W. Bush]] combined? Spot on.
*Do I trust [[Richard Nixon]] more than [[Ronald Reagan]] and [[George W. Bush]] combined? Spot on.
*Atheist? Not really, but I'm not a theist (we can't possibly know if God does exist, so I don't bother)
*Atheist? Yes
**Are theists better people than atheists? No.
**Are theists better people than atheists? No.
**Are atheists better people than theists? No.
**Are atheists better people than theists? No.