20
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 173:
Line 173: + + + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 22:22, March 23, 2007
, 22:22, March 23, 2007Unlocking
:Then go in the history and find the source, and put it back in. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 16:24, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:Then go in the history and find the source, and put it back in. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 16:24, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
*Exactly! And be sure to let either Hoji or me know if another revert war starts. ;-) ---~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 18:07, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
*Exactly! And be sure to let either Hoji or me know if another revert war starts. ;-) ---~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 18:07, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
== Unlocking ==
This article is far from complete. When will it be unlocked so we can add information about scientific data showing natural causes for warming, explanation of the solar flux theory, carbon dioxide tracking temps, cosmoclimatology, paleoclimatology, etc. As it stands it makes it look like all we care about is the political side of things. This can't be true, can it?