Changes

801 bytes added ,  18:59, January 17, 2009
Line 66: Line 66:     
: I think that Andy's problem is that American Indians do not resemble today's orientials, such as those living in China. But Asian is not the same as Chinese. The mainstream theory is that the American Indians are descended from Siberians. See [http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news94.htm], which claims that Navajo and Russian Tuvans have similar DNA. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:08, 17 January 2009 (EST)
 
: I think that Andy's problem is that American Indians do not resemble today's orientials, such as those living in China. But Asian is not the same as Chinese. The mainstream theory is that the American Indians are descended from Siberians. See [http://www.trussel.com/prehist/news94.htm], which claims that Navajo and Russian Tuvans have similar DNA. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:08, 17 January 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:: Your cite is to one person's opinion from a decade ago.  Even scientists who think American Indians somehow descended from Asians admit that they do not know from whom or how, as in this more recent and thorough Russian article:[http://www.russia-ic.com/education_science/science/breakthrough/114/]
 +
 +
:: When a theorem is unproved, then the rational observation is to note that it is unproved and thus it is not known if the theorem is even true.  The origin of the American Indians falls into that category.  Likewise, if the overall temperatures this year are higher than last year's, it is junk science to insist that must be due to man-made [[global warming]].  Instead, the proper answer is that science does not know the reason.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:59, 17 January 2009 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits