Changes

I was creating havoc earlier today by creating a bunch of "date articles" (IE [[January 20]]) before learning that they are not wanted on this website. I was disapointed, but I understand and abide by settled policy.

I was creating havoc earlier today by creating a bunch of "date articles" (IE [[January 20]]) before learning that they are not wanted on this website. I was disapointed, but I understand and abide by settled policy.

BUT, then I asked if I could create some "year articles" (IE [[2001]]). They said they were still against it, but that I could friendly petition you for them. So I wanted to ask what you think. I would do all the dirty work obviously. And I think it would create a kind of timeline within Conservapedia that would be very beneficial to history students. Also, if you are concerned about too many "stub articles", the obvious solution to me is to make the articles by decades, then by centuries as it goes back. (So you don't have a pointless articles all about "1082 AD" and so on.

BUT, then I asked if I could create some "year articles" (IE <nowiki>[[2001]]</nowiki>). They said they were still against it, but that I could friendly petition you for them. So I wanted to ask what you think. I would do all the dirty work obviously. And I think it would create a kind of timeline within Conservapedia that would be very beneficial to history students. Also, if you are concerned about too many "stub articles", the obvious solution to me is to make the articles by decades, then by centuries as it goes back. (So you don't have a pointless articles all about "1082 AD" and so on.

Well, that is my idea, sir. I am here to help, and think this would be a nice addition to this site. Let me know what you think. Thanks!

Well, that is my idea, sir. I am here to help, and think this would be a nice addition to this site. Let me know what you think. Thanks!