Changes

→‎Comments Section: Final answer to Umlaut, et.al.
Line 165: Line 165:  
::I meant "parts of it I only skimmed", not "the only parts I read I skimmed", and this was simply because I really didn't need to see every detail of, say, the punishments.  I read enough of the law to see what it in general listed;  I was merely expressing that, while the general thrust of the law seemed to not mean what this page said, there might have been some minor technicality or precedent that extended its scope or changed its meaning.  Also, was it really neccessary to assume that I was unable to understand it or had not read it, and accuse me of "spewing nonsense"?  You are right, though.  It is not terribly long, and uses few words that could be considered "big". [[User:Umlaut|Umlaut]] 14:06, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 
::I meant "parts of it I only skimmed", not "the only parts I read I skimmed", and this was simply because I really didn't need to see every detail of, say, the punishments.  I read enough of the law to see what it in general listed;  I was merely expressing that, while the general thrust of the law seemed to not mean what this page said, there might have been some minor technicality or precedent that extended its scope or changed its meaning.  Also, was it really neccessary to assume that I was unable to understand it or had not read it, and accuse me of "spewing nonsense"?  You are right, though.  It is not terribly long, and uses few words that could be considered "big". [[User:Umlaut|Umlaut]] 14:06, 28 February 2009 (EST)
   −
::I think it's a fair question, Mr. Schlafly. I found the grammar and style next to incomprehensible. It's not a matter of any one word being big. It's [[legalese]] and cries out for a translation.  
+
::I think it's a fair question, Mr. Schlafly. I found the grammar and style next to incomprehensible. It's not a matter of any one word being big. It's [[legalese]] and cries out for a translation. {{unsigned|Umlaut}}
    
::Please, counselor, be patient with us lesser mortals. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:50, 28 February 2009 (EST)
 
::Please, counselor, be patient with us lesser mortals. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:50, 28 February 2009 (EST)
Line 220: Line 220:     
:Thank you for posing a more thorough analysis.  What I found was the same- the law applies to "protected" computers, which a wiki isn't. [[User:Umlaut|Umlaut]] 07:23, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 
:Thank you for posing a more thorough analysis.  What I found was the same- the law applies to "protected" computers, which a wiki isn't. [[User:Umlaut|Umlaut]] 07:23, 2 March 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
::And a wiki isn't used in international communication? One would have to find the many amendments and definitions of the applicable laws. In any event, this is another [[liberal deceit]], a distraction from our  purpose here, which is building an encyclopedia, NOT discussing if common vandals and cyber terrorists will be punished.  Umlaut, you are in violation of the [[Conservapedia Commandments]] with your endless talk, talk, talk.  I invite you to make substantive contributions here, or busy yourself elsewhere. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 07:39, 2 March 2009 (EST)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits