1,516
edits
Changes
→Reversion of "Role" comments
Equating drug dealers, crack dealers, speed dealers, addicts, pushers and pimps, is not the same thing as a person who has a painful disease and becomes addicted. Addicted, I might add, because a Medical Doctor over-perscribed, and got the person hooked in the first place. I think we can both agree there. What is surprising, but not, is a liberals lack of compassion they demand for common street pimps and pushers, yet when a conservative has the same behavior, you become harsh and even more judgmental than Limbaugh was. That is what I object to, DinsdaleP, your being a hypocrite, your double standard. The group you site is not known for being unbiased or even middle-of-the-road, and you know that. Taking statements, out of context, and from different time periods, is known as smearing. Limbaugh was ''technically'' a hypocrite. Like millions in this world, who say and think one thing unless and until they are walking in someone else's shoes. You added items, not in context, and without any explanation or more of one than to make the subject look bad. That is animosity. Two wrongs, never make a right. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:05, 3 March 2009 (EST)
Equating drug dealers, crack dealers, speed dealers, addicts, pushers and pimps, is not the same thing as a person who has a painful disease and becomes addicted. Addicted, I might add, because a Medical Doctor over-perscribed, and got the person hooked in the first place. I think we can both agree there. What is surprising, but not, is a liberals lack of compassion they demand for common street pimps and pushers, yet when a conservative has the same behavior, you become harsh and even more judgmental than Limbaugh was. That is what I object to, DinsdaleP, your being a hypocrite, your double standard. The group you site is not known for being unbiased or even middle-of-the-road, and you know that. Taking statements, out of context, and from different time periods, is known as smearing. Limbaugh was ''technically'' a hypocrite. Like millions in this world, who say and think one thing unless and until they are walking in someone else's shoes. You added items, not in context, and without any explanation or more of one than to make the subject look bad. That is animosity. Two wrongs, never make a right. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:05, 3 March 2009 (EST)
:I'm not "smearing" Limbaugh - I simply pointed out that he was someone who threw stones in a glass house, so to speak. You may not like the source I used, but the quotes are still from Limbaugh, and they were taken from the time prior to his arrest to make a specific point - up until that time, he was judgmental and lacking in compassion for others who did the very things he wound up being arrested for. If you can interpret another meaning for the statements "too many whites are getting away with drug use" and "The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too.", then I'll keep an open mind.
:Personally, I have no personal animosity towards Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter and their ilk because they have a right to express their views. However, I find them distasteful and repugnant because they make their livings by practicing conservatism as if it's all about condemning and belittling those who disagree with you instead of trying to win them over on the merits of a positive argument. Ronald Reagan is held up as the epitome of what a "true" conservative should be, and these people are nothing like him - Reagan, like William Buckley, worked at winning people over instead of running them over.
:You can call me a hypocrite if you want, but I'm not buying it. I admit when I'm wrong, I admit when I don't have all the answers (which is usually the case), and I don't judge others for being human and therefore subject to human flaws and fallibility, because God knows I'm fallible too. When someone like Limbaugh sits in presumptuous judgment of others, only to back off from holding himself to the same standard, ''that'' invites criticism. An experience like his drug arrest could have led him to show more humility without compromising his other values, but he seems as self-important and judgmental as ever. I have no need to disparage him on CP though - even the edit that started this thread was not intended to attack Limbaugh, but to report on the current events in the news as the GOP looks to re-establish itself and find new leaders. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:16, 3 March 2009 (EST)