| | *Well, perhaps Rob. When you find another two or three scholarly sources for the material. Until then, it is merely a footnote worthy of no more than a mention, like all the Congressional and White House staffers, working for both Liberals and Conservatives, who were found to be Homosexual. Same for staffers and key aids for some of the most important evangelical ministers in America. Until I came here, I had never once heard anyone deny that many of the top Nazi's were Gay. It figures very prominently in the literature and even pornography. Pornography from the 1930's and 1940's. But to think the homo-erotic orientation of some German Nazi's had some broad policy implications, impacting on the Holocaust or Hitler's foreign policy, is nonsense. About as nonsensical as making that assumption about the Gays who worked for John Ashcroft when Governor of Missouri, or as Attorney General, or Ronald Reagan, or even on Billy Graham's staff. If we follow the path you are suggesting, then articles on noted religious leaders will be open to the same. I don't really think we want that, do we? --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 18:33, 24 March 2007 (EDT) | | *Well, perhaps Rob. When you find another two or three scholarly sources for the material. Until then, it is merely a footnote worthy of no more than a mention, like all the Congressional and White House staffers, working for both Liberals and Conservatives, who were found to be Homosexual. Same for staffers and key aids for some of the most important evangelical ministers in America. Until I came here, I had never once heard anyone deny that many of the top Nazi's were Gay. It figures very prominently in the literature and even pornography. Pornography from the 1930's and 1940's. But to think the homo-erotic orientation of some German Nazi's had some broad policy implications, impacting on the Holocaust or Hitler's foreign policy, is nonsense. About as nonsensical as making that assumption about the Gays who worked for John Ashcroft when Governor of Missouri, or as Attorney General, or Ronald Reagan, or even on Billy Graham's staff. If we follow the path you are suggesting, then articles on noted religious leaders will be open to the same. I don't really think we want that, do we? --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 18:33, 24 March 2007 (EDT) |